Query
Find articles
Pick a keyword, optionally a second one to combine it with (and, or, either but not both, or but not), then narrow the articles down by text, source and time range. Keywords update the results right away; filters apply with their button.
Query
How they overlap
Of the articles on each keyword in the last 7 days, with the same text and sources, how many also mention the other. Per lean: the share of its outlets' articles on war that mention Vladimir Putin.
8.3% of the 48 articles on war also mention Vladimir Putin, as do 3.6% of the 110 articles on Vladimir Putin.
- Left-leaning2 of 21 articles
- 9.5%
- Least biased0 of 8 articles
- 0.0%
- Right-leaning2 of 19 articles
- 10.5%
Who picked it up when
The Daily Wire mentioned it first (Oct 23, 2026, 6:34 AM EDT). Left-leaning outlets followed 6 hours later. No least biased outlet mentioned it.
One row per source with a matching article, from the most left-leaning on top: a dot for each article, on a bar for each stretch of its coverage (a pause of more than 24 hours starts a new one). Hover or tap a dot for the headline, click it to read the article.
Source lean:leftcenterright
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
Results
4 articles mention war and Vladimir Putin in the last 7 days (Oct 21 to Oct 27).
| Article | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| The Wall Street Journal | Opinion | Elon Musk, Starlink and Vladimir PutinThe Wall Street Journal The SpaceX CEO misses the real ‘bloodthirsty warmongers’ in Moscow. | 0.65 | |
| The Guardian | War Is Interested in You by Gideon Rachman review – are we on the brink of world war three?The Guardian A foreign affairs expert’s bleak assessment of the state of global security Are we on the brink of a new world war? This bleak subject is increasingly invoked by leaders, soldiers and officials, from Donald Trump to Vladimir Putin to the heads of our military and intelligence services. It’s an urgent theme, then, for the FT foreign affairs columnist Gideon Rachman to explore in his latest survey of global diplomacy. Rachman draws his title from the expression, sometimes attributed to Trotsky: “You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you” – the idea being that conflict doesn’t much care whether we like to think about it or not: it will come knocking on our doors regardless. Clearly, humanity is in a particularly unsafe spot right now, but seeing our security issues laid out like this, catalogued and mapped and analysed, they seem almost overwhelming. To summarise: the most powerful, nuclear-armed states – the US, China and Russia – are led by unscrupulous, self-dealing “strongmen”, each of whom is playing with the nationalist “Great Again” politics epitomised by Trump. Democracy is being rolled back around the world, and even bastions of liberalism such as the UK, France and Germany seem vulnerable to takeover by the Putin-friendly far right. The so-called rules-based international order and its institutions – the UN, the WTO, Nato – are being deliberately undermined by the aforementioned strongmen, and are as weak now as they have ever been. Continue reading... | 0.65 | |
| Bloomberg | Putin’s Temporary Control of Metro Unit Reaps Funds for War PushBloomberg The local unit of German grocer Metro said it committed 1 billion rubles ($12.4 million) to Russia’s war effort a month after Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered it be put into temporary administration. | 0.70● | |
| The Daily Wire | Exposing The Brutal Realities Of Putin’s War On HumanityThe Daily Wire Vladimir Putin is many things; a “humanitarian” is not one of them. Steven Witkoff may think sycophantic praise for the Russian president will get Putin to a deal, but that ignores two important realities. First, Putin and his army have brutalized his own people and committed numerous and heinous war crimes against the people of ... | 0.80● |
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
Narrow further
Other keywords in the matching articles: the share of them that mention each, with the number of articles.
No other keyword appears in more than one of the matching articles.
Coverage by source
The share of each source's stories in the last 7 days that match the query, from left to right. Sort the table to reorder the bars.
Source lean:leftcenterright
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
| The Guardian | 0.2% | 1 | 632 |
| Bloomberg | 0.3% | 1 | 331 |
| The Wall Street Journal | 1.6% | 1 | 64 |
| The Daily Wire | 0.5% | 1 | 207 |
Coverage by lean
The share of stories that match the query, in the last 7 days, averaged over the outlets of each political lean with at least 3 stories. The groups differ in size, so a single outlet weighs more in the smaller ones.
- Left-leaning2 of 15 sources
- <0.1%
- Least biased0 of 8 sources
- 0.0%
- Right-leaning2 of 15 sources
- 0.1%
Lean index +3.5: covered more by right-leaning outlets
Each outlet at its MBFC bias score, from −10 (far left) to +10 (far right), as high as the share of its stories that match the query. The lean index is the average score of the outlets covering it, weighted by that share.
lean indexour sources' average (+0.4)leftcenterright
Bias scores by Media Bias/Fact Check.
Source leans based on ratings by Media Bias/Fact Check.