Press Hound

Query

Find articles

Pick a keyword, optionally a second one to combine it with (and, or, either but not both, or but not), then narrow the articles down by text, source and time range. Keywords update the results right away; filters apply with their button.

Query

Keywords · results update right away
cybersecuritytopic
AI safetytopic
Filters · apply with the button

How they overlap

Of the articles on each keyword in the last 7 days, with the same text and sources, how many also mention the other. Per lean: the share of its outlets' articles on cybersecurity that mention AI safety.

4.3% of the 94 articles on cybersecurity also mention AI safety, as do 19.1% of the 21 articles on AI safety.

Left-leaning3 of 37 articles
8.1%
Least biased1 of 25 articles
4.0%
Right-leaning0 of 32 articles
0.0%

Who picked it up when

It was already in the news on Oct 20, when this period starts, so who reported it first is not shown. No right-leaning outlet mentioned it.

One row per source with a matching article, from the most left-leaning on top: a dot for each article, on a bar for each stretch of its coverage (a pause of more than 24 hours starts a new one). Hover or tap a dot for the headline, click it to read the article.

Drag across the strip of articles per day to zoom into some days.

Source lean:leftcenterright

Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.

Results

4 articles mention cybersecurity and AI safety in the last 7 days (Oct 20 to Oct 26).

Articles matching the query
Article
Hacker News: Front PageAn alignment assessment of the UK AISI cybertesting incidentHacker News: Front Page

Article URL: https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessment-ukaisi Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50209939 Points: 10 # Comments: 1

0.75
The GuardianThe Guardian view on AI safety: the push for global regulation must advance | EditorialThe Guardian

The current US administration is an obstacle, but public demand for protection will ultimately prevail Organisations around the world scrambled on Thursday to fix critical flaws in PHP, the software that powers much of the web. The vulnerabilities could allow attackers to take control of affected servers. Some websites were taken offline as a precaution while fixes were installed. The paradox is that while AI helped researchers uncover the flaw, it also threatens to accelerate the ability to exploit it. Amazon said that it had detected an attempt before the public disclosure of the PHP flaws. What the episode highlights is AI’s central role in security – and not always for the right reasons. OpenAI’s models have also been responsible for two alarming hacks this year – a security breach of an Australian health department website and a raid by a swarm of AI bots on Hugging Face, an AI services platform. Citing those incidents, the AI minister, Kanishka Narayan, warned that a similar cyber-attack on the UK is “likely, if not inevitable”. Continue reading...

0.80
CNBCOpenAI's most powerful AI models disabled their own safety monitoring — and one lied about itCNBC

Warnings about the risks of developing increasingly advanced AI systems have ramped up in recent months, amid cyberattacks from rogue AI models.

0.55
TIMEAI Safety and Cybersecurity Should Be Allies. Instead, They're at OddsTIME

As AI grows more powerful, two communities are clashing over how to keep it under control—and who gets to decide whether it's safe.

0.90●

Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.

Other keywords in the matching articles: the share of them that mention each, with the number of articles. The search icon searches for cybersecurity and that keyword instead of AI safety, keeping the text, sources, source type and time range.

Coverage by source

The share of each source's stories in the last 7 days that match the query, from left to right. Sort the table to reorder the bars.

Source lean:leftcenterright

Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.

Articles mentioning cybersecurity and AI safety, by source, in the last 7 days
TIME1.5%167
The Guardian0.1%1703
CNBC0.3%1320
Hacker News: Front Page0.6%1159

Coverage by lean

The share of stories that match the query, in the last 7 days, averaged over the outlets of each political lean with at least 3 stories. The groups differ in size, so a single outlet weighs more in the smaller ones.

Left-leaning3 of 15 sources
0.1%
Least biased1 of 8 sources
0.1%
Right-leaning0 of 15 sources
0.0%

Lean index −3.1: covered more by left-leaning outlets

Each outlet at its MBFC bias score, from −10 (far left) to +10 (far right), as high as the share of its stories that match the query. The lean index is the average score of the outlets covering it, weighted by that share.

lean indexour sources' average (+0.4)leftcenterright

Bias scores by Media Bias/Fact Check.

Source leans based on ratings by Media Bias/Fact Check.