Query
Find articles
Pick a keyword, optionally a second one to combine it with (and, or, either but not both, or but not), then narrow the articles down by text, source and time range. Keywords update the results right away; filters apply with their button.
Query
How they overlap
Of the articles on each keyword in the last 7 days, with the same text and sources, how many also mention the other. Per lean: the share of its outlets' articles on election that mention American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
0.6% of the 527 articles on election also mention American Israel Public Affairs Committee, as do 42.9% of the 7 articles on American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
- Left-leaning2 of 207 articles
- 1.0%
- Least biased0 of 89 articles
- 0.0%
- Right-leaning1 of 231 articles
- 0.4%
Who picked it up when
Democracy Now! mentioned it first (Oct 22, 2026, 8:25 AM EDT). Right-leaning outlets followed 27 hours later. No least biased outlet mentioned it.
One row per source with a matching article, from the most left-leaning on top: a dot for each article, on a bar for each stretch of its coverage (a pause of more than 24 hours starts a new one). Hover or tap a dot for the headline, click it to read the article.
Source lean:leftcenterright
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
Results
3 articles mention election and American Israel Public Affairs Committee in the last 7 days (Oct 20 to Oct 26).
| Article | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Washington Examiner | Criticize AIPAC. But apply the same standard to everyoneWashington Examiner AIPAC is changing the way it participates in American elections. The pro-Israel organization said this week that it will stop issuing candidate endorsements, making direct PAC contributions, and earmarking donations for candidates. Its affiliated super PAC, United Democracy Project, will continue operating, and AIPAC says it will expand organized giving directly from individual members. In […] | 0.70 | |
| The Guardian | Aipac halts candidate endorsements amid US backlash against IsraelThe Guardian Political candidates’ once reflexive support for Israel has increasingly become a liability When the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the most prominent pro-Israel lobby group in the US, announced on Wednesday that it would stop endorsing candidates or make direct contributions to them, its many critics were quick to hail the development as Aipac’s admission of how toxic its brand had become. The announcement marked a significant reversal that underscored just how profoundly US public opinion of Israel has shifted over the latest war in Gaza , and how political candidates’ once reflexive support for Israel has increasingly become a liability . Continue reading... | 0.70 | |
| Democracy Now! | Should AIPAC Register as a Foreign Agent? Zeteo Examines Pro-Israel Lobby's Influence on ElectionsDemocracy Now! The growing controversy over AIPAC’s impact on U.S. politics is the subject of a new Zeteo documentary titled Night Flower: Inside AIPAC’s Fight for Influence . The film examines AIPAC’s history and its role in shaping U.S. policy toward Israel, and questions whether its activities warrant further scrutiny under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, or FARA . “It says that you have to register under this law if you are acting at the request of a foreign government,” says Dion Nissenbaum, the filmmaker behind Night Flower: Inside AIPAC’s Fight for Influence . “And we talked to numerous people who showed us several examples of how AIPAC is acting at the request of Israel.” Referencing the title of the film, Night Flower , Zeteo editor-in-chief Mehdi Hasan says AIPAC “blossoms in the dark, shrivels in the light. We’re trying to put some sunlight onto AIPAC .” | 0.70● |
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
Narrow further
Other keywords in the matching articles: the share of them that mention each, with the number of articles. The search icon searches for election and that keyword instead of American Israel Public Affairs Committee, keeping the text, sources, source type and time range.
Coverage by source
The share of each source's stories in the last 7 days that match the query, from left to right. Sort the table to reorder the bars.
Source lean:leftcenterright
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
| Democracy Now! | 7.1% | 1 | 14 |
| The Guardian | 0.2% | 1 | 605 |
| Washington Examiner | 0.4% | 1 | 281 |
Coverage by lean
The share of stories that match the query, in the last 7 days, averaged over the outlets of each political lean with at least 3 stories. The groups differ in size, so a single outlet weighs more in the smaller ones.
- Left-leaning2 of 15 sources
- 0.5%
- Least biased0 of 8 sources
- 0.0%
- Right-leaning1 of 15 sources
- <0.1%
Lean index −6.3: covered more by left-leaning outlets
Each outlet at its MBFC bias score, from −10 (far left) to +10 (far right), as high as the share of its stories that match the query. The lean index is the average score of the outlets covering it, weighted by that share.
lean indexour sources' average (+0.4)leftcenterright
Bias scores by Media Bias/Fact Check.
1 source has no MBFC bias score and is not shown.
Source leans based on ratings by Media Bias/Fact Check.