Press Hound

Query

Find articles

Pick a keyword, optionally a second one to combine it with (and, or, either but not both, or but not), then narrow the articles down by text, source and time range. Keywords update the results right away; filters apply with their button.

Query

Keywords · results update right away
cyberattacktopic
artificial intelligencetopic
Filters · apply with the button

How they overlap

Of the articles on each keyword in the last 7 days, with the same text and sources, how many also mention the other. Per lean: the share of its outlets' articles on cyberattack that mention artificial intelligence.

100.0% of the 2 articles on cyberattack also mention artificial intelligence, as do 0.4% of the 521 articles on artificial intelligence.

Left-leaning1 of 1 article
100.0%
Least biasedno article on cyberattack
–
Right-leaning1 of 1 article
100.0%

Who picked it up when

Axios mentioned it first (Oct 21, 2026, 8:00 AM EDT). Right-leaning outlets followed 23 hours later. No least biased outlet mentioned it.

One row per source with a matching article, from the most left-leaning on top: a dot for each article, on a bar for each stretch of its coverage (a pause of more than 24 hours starts a new one). Hover or tap a dot for the headline, click it to read the article.

Drag across the strip of articles per day to zoom into some days.

Source lean:leftcenterright

Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.

Results

2 articles mention cyberattack and artificial intelligence in the last 7 days (Oct 20 to Oct 26).

Articles matching the query
Article
The Washington TimesChina's open AI models vulnerable to backdoor threatsThe Washington Times

A security company recently conducted an open artificial intelligence experiment revealing serious potential security flaws in China-built AI models in use around the world -- flaws that China could exploit for cyberattacks, cyberespionage and other nefarious online activities.

0.60
AxiosAI is getting better at hacking power and water systems, new research showsAxios

The world's most advanced AI models are suddenly capable of blueprinting cyberttacks on critical services like power grids and water systems with alarming success rates, according to new research . Why it matters: Critical infrastructure operators are running out of time. Top-tier frontier models are dangerously adept at mapping out attacks, new research from cybersecurity company Frenos shows, and it's only a matter of time before freely available AI models make such hacks easier to execute. "It's a clock that is moving faster than we've ever seen," Steve Swick, former top security executive at American Electric Power, told reporters during a briefing. Driving the news: Researchers at Frenos tested 10 AI models on their ability to plan attacks against industrial systems, such as the software that monitors water treatment processes. Three out of 10 models tested successfully constructed attack plans in roughly 90% of attempts. Performance varied widely: Three models the researchers considered to be at the frontier of capabilities succeeded in just 17.9% to 31.9% of attempts. The strongest foreign open-weight model succeeded 36.2% of the time, while the strongest U.S. open-weight model succeeded just 5.2%. Frenos did not disclose the names of the models tested. Zoom in : The research included nearly 17,000 tests, including 2,520 attempts to construct complete attack plans. The models received information about potential targets and tasked with piecing together the steps needed to achieve specific objectives. The big picture: Critical services like water systems and manufacturing plants have long been targets for nation-state adversaries and cybercriminals. Many operators face staffing and budget constraints. Testing and upgrading their systems can also risk disruptions to essential services that they can't afford. Unlike traditional corporate networks, industrial systems can be sensitive to unexpected traffic and commands. Even an unsuccessful attack attempt could disrupt essential operations. Threat level: Once attackers gain access to an industrial network, AI could help them quietly map out systems and identify weaknesses without the same time constraints facing human hackers, Frenos co-founder and CTO Harry Thomas said. "AI doesn't have the problem with patience," Thomas said. "It doesn't need to eat. It doesn't need to sleep, and it doesn't need to use the restroom." Paul Shaver, head of operational technology at cybersecurity firm Armadin, added that AI agents can already conduct reconnaissance and analyze large volumes of data without necessarily triggering security alerts. The intrigue : Thomas said the researchers used a relatively simple setup to guide the models through their tasks. More sophisticated tools that provide additional context and feedback could improve their performance. "A more capable harness could have given these AI models more of an edge," he said. What to watch : Several initiatives — including from the White House , frontier AI companies , and cybersecurity organizations — have cropped up in recent weeks to help lower the costs and provide resources for critical infrastructure organizations. Go deeper : Frightening AI advances speed race to secure critical infrastructure

0.75

Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.

Other keywords in the matching articles: the share of them that mention each, with the number of articles.

No other keyword appears in more than one of the matching articles.

Coverage by source

The share of each source's stories in the last 7 days that match the query, from left to right. Sort the table to reorder the bars.

Source lean:leftcenterright

Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.

Articles mentioning cyberattack and artificial intelligence, by source, in the last 7 days
Axios1.3%179
The Washington Times0.3%1382

Coverage by lean

The share of stories that match the query, in the last 7 days, averaged over the outlets of each political lean with at least 3 stories. The groups differ in size, so a single outlet weighs more in the smaller ones.

Left-leaning1 of 15 sources
0.1%
Least biased0 of 8 sources
0.0%
Right-leaning1 of 15 sources
<0.1%

Lean index −2.8: covered more by left-leaning outlets

Each outlet at its MBFC bias score, from −10 (far left) to +10 (far right), as high as the share of its stories that match the query. The lean index is the average score of the outlets covering it, weighted by that share.

lean indexour sources' average (+0.4)leftcenterright

Bias scores by Media Bias/Fact Check.

1 source has no MBFC bias score and is not shown.

Source leans based on ratings by Media Bias/Fact Check.