Query
Find articles
Pick a keyword, optionally a second one to combine it with (and, or, either but not both, or but not), then narrow the articles down by text, source and time range. Keywords update the results right away; filters apply with their button.
Query
How they overlap
Of the articles on each keyword in the last 7 days, with the same text and sources, how many also mention the other. Per lean: the share of its outlets' articles on Cambridge Analytica that mention fraud.
40.0% of the 5 articles on Cambridge Analytica also mention fraud, as do 1.2% of the 163 articles on fraud.
- Left-leaning2 of 3 articles
- 66.7%
- Least biased0 of 1 article
- 0.0%
- Right-leaning0 of 1 article
- 0.0%
Who picked it up when
It was already in the news on Oct 21, when this period starts, so who reported it first is not shown. No least biased outlet mentioned it. No right-leaning outlet mentioned it.
One row per source with a matching article, from the most left-leaning on top: a dot for each article, on a bar for each stretch of its coverage (a pause of more than 24 hours starts a new one). Hover or tap a dot for the headline, click it to read the article.
Source lean:leftcenterright
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
Results
2 articles mention Cambridge Analytica and fraud in the last 7 days (Oct 21 to Oct 27).
| Article | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CNBC | Meta ordered to pay $25 billion penalty in New Mexico Cambridge Analytica caseCNBC Meta to pay $25 billion in penalties related to Cambridge Analytica scandal in New Mexico. | 0.40 | |
| Axios | Meta hit with $25 billion penalty for misleading Facebook usersAxios A New Mexico judge ordered Meta to pay $25 billion in penalties Wednesday after a jury found in September that the social media giant misled users about their data privacy. Why it matters: The penalties come nearly a decade after the Cambridge Analytica scandal first broke and signal that Big Tech can face significant financial consequences for misleading users about their privacy. Driving the news: Judge Francis Mathew determined the penalty amount Wednesday, handing New Mexico a win as the only state to take its claims to trial after 48 others settled. Mathew concluded New Mexico was entitled to $219.5 billion based on the state's maximum $5,000 penalty multiplied by 43,899,720 violations. He reduced that to $25 billion. Meta did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment. The company has previously said it expects to appeal the decision. Catch up quick: In September, a New Mexico jury said Meta had committed 43 million "willful violations" of the New Mexico Unfair Practices Act. Mathew found that Facebook's privacy controls failed to give users meaningful control over their data and that third-party app developers could access their information through the platform's systems. Mathew found Mark Zuckerberg knew users didn't understand how data privacy works, and exploited that, noting that the CEO had once written that users "probably don't understand their current privacy settings or care about who sees their updates." Zuckerberg also wrote that the company should give users "a chance to change their privacy settings but obviously don't encourage it." Zoom out: The suit followed reporting that revealed data firm Cambridge Analytica had harvested data from more than 50 million Facebook users to craft political ads during the 2016 election. After the scandal, Facebook promised more transparency, but the court found Meta failed to consistently inform users when their data was misused. Editor's note: This story has been updated with additional information throughout. | 0.45 |
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
Narrow further
Other keywords in the matching articles: the share of them that mention each, with the number of articles. The search icon searches for Cambridge Analytica and that keyword instead of fraud, keeping the text, sources, source type and time range.
Coverage by source
The share of each source's stories in the last 7 days that match the query, from left to right. Sort the table to reorder the bars.
Source lean:leftcenterright
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
| CNBC | 0.4% | 1 | 271 |
| Axios | 1.7% | 1 | 60 |
Coverage by lean
The share of stories that match the query, in the last 7 days, averaged over the outlets of each political lean with at least 3 stories. The groups differ in size, so a single outlet weighs more in the smaller ones.
- Left-leaning2 of 15 sources
- 0.1%
- Least biased0 of 8 sources
- 0.0%
- Right-leaning0 of 15 sources
- 0.0%
Lean index −2.9: covered more by left-leaning outlets
Each outlet at its MBFC bias score, from −10 (far left) to +10 (far right), as high as the share of its stories that match the query. The lean index is the average score of the outlets covering it, weighted by that share.
lean indexour sources' average (+0.4)leftcenterright
Bias scores by Media Bias/Fact Check.
Source leans based on ratings by Media Bias/Fact Check.