Query
Find articles
Pick a keyword, optionally a second one to combine it with (and, or, either but not both, or but not), then narrow the articles down by text, source and time range. Keywords update the results right away; filters apply with their button.
Query
Who picked it up when
It was already in the news on Oct 21, when this period starts, so who reported it first is not shown.
One row per source with a matching article, from the most left-leaning on top: a dot for each article, on a bar for each stretch of its coverage (a pause of more than 24 hours starts a new one). Hover or tap a dot for the headline, click it to read the article.
Source lean:leftcenterright
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
Results
5 articles mention Clayface in the last 7 days (Oct 21 to Oct 27).
| Article | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forbes | ‘Clayface’ Ties ‘Obsession’ For A Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score RecordForbes 'Clayface' has a Rotten Tomatoes audience score that matches Obsession's a wild achievement for the comic book film. | 0.60● | |
| Forbes | ‘Clayface’ Surprises As One Of The Best Comic Book Movies In YearsForbes 'Clayface' is one of the best comic book movies in years thanks to expert direction, writing and a new star in the role of Matt Hagen. | 0.50● | |
| Breitbart | Nolte: ‘Clayface’ Looks Like Another James Gunn DC DisappointmentBreitbart "Clayface" has drawn tepid reviews and box-office tracking that makes "Supergirl" look like a monster hit. The post Nolte: ‘Clayface’ Looks Like Another James Gunn DC Disappointment appeared first on Breitbart . | 0.70● | |
| Forbes | The ‘Clayface’ Rotten Tomatoes Review Score Is The Second-Lowest In The DCUForbes 'Clayface' reviews are in, and while they are pretty good, its Rotten Tomatoes score is below every other DCU project but one so far. | 0.50● | |
| The Guardian | Clayface review – flesh-stretching DC body horror is very gory but not very goodThe Guardian Liverpool makes for an unconvincing Gotham City in this effectively gross but otherwise middling attempt to milk money from a lesser-known Batman villain A sense of desperation is understandably in the air over at DC, the company, like Marvel, slowly realising that the mass superhero fever has finally broken. There’s still interest there, of course (this summer’s Spider-Man is now the biggest film of all time in the US after all), but it’s no longer good enough to leave a high-speed conveyor belt unmanned, purpose and quality control be damned. 2019 saw a staggering 10 superhero films released in cinemas, and the inevitable exhaustion that followed, also fueled by Covid, led to a gradual winding down, monster hits turning into minor ones and sure bets often becoming expensive flops. As Peter Parker winged his way to box office records this summer, DC’s Supergirl bombed so hard that experts believe it might have cost Warners upwards of $200m in losses. It was just the latest disappointment for the brand after Black Adam, Joker: Folie à Deux, Blue Beetle and The Flash all underperformed while even last year’s much-heralded Superman reboot only grossed a solid $618m, a far cry from the $1bn heyday of the genre (things got so bad that even a fully filmed Batgirl adventure was deleted for the tax break ). Notably, the last DC film to swoop past that magic figure was Joker in 2019, a darker, lower-budget attempt to spotlight a villain rather than a hero, a big swing with relatively low stakes. Todd Phillips’s film might be best known by some for being brave enough to ask the question, “What if Taxi Driver sucked?” but for all of its many issues, it brought buzz and prestige and, shockingly, Oscars, to an easily ridiculed universe. It was also, crucially, something rare in that world: a close-to-good idea. Continue reading... | 0.50● |
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
Narrow further
Other keywords in the matching articles: the share of them that mention each, with the number of articles. The search icon searches for Clayface and that keyword, keeping the text, sources, source type and time range.
Coverage by source
The share of each source's stories in the last 7 days that match the query, from left to right. Sort the table to reorder the bars.
Source lean:leftcenterright
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
| The Guardian | 0.2% | 1 | 609 |
| Forbes | 0.9% | 3 | 346 |
| Breitbart | 0.3% | 1 | 369 |
Coverage by lean
The share of stories that match the query, in the last 7 days, averaged over the outlets of each political lean with at least 3 stories. The groups differ in size, so a single outlet weighs more in the smaller ones.
- Left-leaning1 of 15 sources
- <0.1%
- Least biased1 of 8 sources
- 0.1%
- Right-leaning1 of 15 sources
- <0.1%
Lean index +2.1: covered more by right-leaning outlets
Each outlet at its MBFC bias score, from −10 (far left) to +10 (far right), as high as the share of its stories that match the query. The lean index is the average score of the outlets covering it, weighted by that share.
lean indexour sources' average (+0.4)leftcenterright
Bias scores by Media Bias/Fact Check.
Source leans based on ratings by Media Bias/Fact Check.