Press Hound

Query

Find articles

Pick a keyword, optionally a second one to combine it with (and, or, either but not both, or but not), then narrow the articles down by text, source and time range. Keywords update the results right away; filters apply with their button.

Query

Keywords · results update right away
deepfaketopic
Filters · apply with the button

Who picked it up when

The Free Press mentioned it first (Oct 23, 2026, 6:03 AM EDT). Least biased outlets followed 5 hours later, left-leaning outlets 7 hours later.

One row per source with a matching article, from the most left-leaning on top: a dot for each article, on a bar for each stretch of its coverage (a pause of more than 24 hours starts a new one). Hover or tap a dot for the headline, click it to read the article.

Drag across the strip of articles per day to zoom into some days.

Source lean:leftcenterright

Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.

Results

4 articles mention deepfake in the last 7 days (Oct 20 to Oct 26).

Articles matching the query
Article
Reason"AI Deepfakes in Court"Reason

Damien Charlotin, who runs the invaluable AI Hallucination Cases site (2200+ cases worldwide and counting) has a new one, AI… The post "AI Deepfakes in Court" appeared first on Reason Magazine.

0.70●
The GuardianOpposition deepfake video sparks outrage in Spain ahead of electionThe Guardian

Video shows AI likenesses of people linked to Pedro Sánchez’s Socialist party appearing to admit to wrongdoing A political ad from Spain’s main opposition party that used a deepfake video of the prime minister’s wife has sparked outrage and set off a wider debate on AI, as the deeply polarised country gears up for general elections next month. Launched this week across the social media channels of the conservative People’s party (PP), the video used artificial intelligence to manipulate the likenesses of various people linked to Pedro Sánchez’s Socialist party and appeared to show them admitting to acts such as soliciting prostitutes and taking kickbacks. Continue reading...

0.80●
UPIBrazil's presidential runoff puts AI, deepfakes, Meta under scrutinyUPI

Two days before Brazil's presidential runoff, the Superior Electoral Court is dealing with a wave disinformation and manipulated digital content,

0.60●
The Free PressTGIF: The Deepfake of the DeepfakePaid postThe Free Press

Today in TGIF: The newest MAGA scam, ‘scuffles’ in France, Foursquare sunsets, Starlink stutters in Ukraine, and more! Hello, and welcome back to the week in review. I’m Nellie Bowles, and this is your brain on TGIF. → Is Trump privatizing Social Security?: Trump Accounts are turning into a very interesting little charitable financial vehicle. Elon Musk announced this week that he’ll be giving SpaceX shares “to every kid in America.” The shares will apparently be distributed through Trump Accounts. And now the plan is to expand Trump Accounts to anyone under 40 (Gen X screwed again). It’s starting to look a little like a new Social Security system being built in parallel. And the exciting twist: This one can actually invest in the stock market and, like, grow. Wouldn’t that be something? Everyone gets to go for a fun ride with SpaceX stock. By the way, as a CEO, it’s a great way to sway the public in your favor: All of America’s children are by default invested in the success of this one company? Perfect. I could see this being a great tool for embattled CEOs in general, even on a smaller scale. Sue my sweet company? You mean you want to punish all the children in Memphis who received these shares? You monster. → Congress is going to flip, adjust your scams appropriately: Alert! Alert! The House and Senate are likely both flipping, and will have a Democratic majority. Nate Silver gives Democrats the edge (to be fair, others think it’s more of a toss-up). Everyone, please adjust your scams. Drop the word America from your NGO and add the word Equity. But before you dye your hair blue, you should know that tons and tons of polling you read is fake. Like, literally just fake. The latest here is a public opinion polling shop called Wedgewood Polling, which was cited on MS NOW and in The New York Times (places that would never lead us astray). Wedgewood made this statement on their now-terminated X account: WEDGEWOOD POLLING, an experimental project to demonstrate the vulnerabilities, lack of oversight, and overall low barrier to entry in the modern political polling industry, makes this public statement. . . . Despite having no history, formal credentials, or real data behind the vast majority of our releases, Wedgewood Polling was added to major polling aggregators, including The New York Times, FiftyPlusOne, and VoteHub, and repeatedly treated as a legitimate data source. Ha ha. Cool. You got us, Wedgewood! Why do I increasingly feel like we’re all a part of a YouTube prank show? → President Elon: Elon Musk—America’s technological savior and also its most in-demand problematic sperm donor—is apparently setting geopolitical policy through his control of space internet. Here’s what happened: Musk slowed down Ukraine’s military Starlink internet, called Starshield, after the country bombed Russian diesel refineries, which apparently he didn’t like, according to The Wall Street Journal (which is on such a run, my god it’s good, good lord I’m mad). So he capped their internet speed, which made some of their drones unworkable. There are conflicting reports of whether the administration knew about this or not. Now, on the one hand, Musk made Starlink. If the government is so good at stuff, why didn’t it make Starlink? On the other hand, Starlink is so valuable that it literally might need to be nationalized. Sure, then the satellites will never be repaired and every Starlink tech will have to prove that they have one disability. But the alternative is Elon Musk alone, between rapid X posting, will control geopolitics. He’s going to hit the wrong button and whoops, bye Europe. As a notoriously stable genius once said: No one should have all that power. Especially a man who can’t seem to manage his own warring harem, so I’m doubtful about his ability to singularly manage the postwar international rules-based order. Like, when one of the mothers of his children needs his attention, she will quite literally post about it, begging for him t…

0.70●

Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.

Other keywords in the matching articles: the share of them that mention each, with the number of articles. The search icon searches for deepfake and that keyword, keeping the text, sources, source type and time range.

Coverage by source

The share of each source's stories in the last 7 days that match the query, from left to right. Sort the table to reorder the bars.

Source lean:leftcenterright

Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.

Articles mentioning deepfake, by source, in the last 7 days
The Guardian0.1%1716
UPI0.6%1163
Reason0.9%1118
The Free Press2.6%139

Coverage by lean

The share of stories that match the query, in the last 7 days, averaged over the outlets of each political lean with at least 3 stories. The groups differ in size, so a single outlet weighs more in the smaller ones.

Left-leaning1 of 15 sources
<0.1%
Least biased1 of 8 sources
0.1%
Right-leaning2 of 15 sources
0.2%

Lean index +3.4: covered more by right-leaning outlets

Each outlet at its MBFC bias score, from −10 (far left) to +10 (far right), as high as the share of its stories that match the query. The lean index is the average score of the outlets covering it, weighted by that share.

lean indexour sources' average (+0.4)leftcenterright

Bias scores by Media Bias/Fact Check.

Source leans based on ratings by Media Bias/Fact Check.