Query
Find articles
Pick a keyword, optionally a second one to combine it with (and, or, either but not both, or but not), then narrow the articles down by text, source and time range. Keywords update the results right away; filters apply with their button.
Query
Who picked it up when
It was already in the news on Oct 21, when this period starts, so who reported it first is not shown.
One row per source with a matching article, from the most left-leaning on top: a dot for each article, on a bar for each stretch of its coverage (a pause of more than 24 hours starts a new one). Hover or tap a dot for the headline, click it to read the article.
Source lean:leftcenterright
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
Results
5 articles mention polling in the last 7 days (Oct 21 to Oct 27).
| Article | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| The Hill | Nate Silver: Polling 'would have to be very wrong' for Republicans to maintain House controlThe Hill Pollster Nate Silver claimed Sunday that polling “would have to be very wrong” for Republicans to hold on to the House, comments that came a little more than a week before this year’s midterms. “You've seen high turnout in Democratic primaries all year. We talk about the early voting data too. You know, the hard... | 0.60● | |
| Politico | How a fake pollster may have moved some 2026 electionsPolitico Wedgewood Polls admitted that it had made up its survey results. Some candidates say those faked numbers killed their campaigns. | 0.70 | |
| Washington Examiner | What we know about who’s behind the fake polling operation Wedgewood PollsWashington Examiner Who exactly was running Wedgewood Polls, an admittedly fraudulent polling firm whose data have appeared over the past four months on the polling sites of some of the country’s top aggregators, and why they pursued the project remains one of the biggest mysteries in Washington just weeks before the midterm elections. Several reports say the […] | 0.70● | |
| New York Post | Sneaky troll polls boost the far left — yet we keep falling for themNew York Post A brand-new pollster with no track record, no known institution behind it, and nobody checking its work? Voter beware. | 0.70● | |
| National Review | The Wedgewood Fake Polls ScandalNational Review An actual fake polls scandal shows the need for continued skeptical appraisal, not simply ignoring all polling data. | 0.60 |
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
Narrow further
Other keywords in the matching articles: the share of them that mention each, with the number of articles. The search icon searches for polling and that keyword, keeping the text, sources, source type and time range.
Coverage by source
The share of each source's stories in the last 7 days that match the query, from left to right. Sort the table to reorder the bars.
Source lean:leftcenterright
Source leans by Media Bias/Fact Check.
| Politico | 4.0% | 1 | 25 |
| The Hill | 0.3% | 1 | 349 |
| Washington Examiner | 0.4% | 1 | 287 |
| New York Post | 0.1% | 1 | 801 |
| National Review | 2.5% | 1 | 40 |
Coverage by lean
The share of stories that match the query, in the last 7 days, averaged over the outlets of each political lean with at least 3 stories. The groups differ in size, so a single outlet weighs more in the smaller ones.
- Left-leaning1 of 15 sources
- 0.3%
- Least biased1 of 8 sources
- <0.1%
- Right-leaning3 of 15 sources
- 0.2%
Lean index +0.9: covered about evenly across the spectrum
Each outlet at its MBFC bias score, from −10 (far left) to +10 (far right), as high as the share of its stories that match the query. The lean index is the average score of the outlets covering it, weighted by that share.
lean indexour sources' average (+0.4)leftcenterright
Bias scores by Media Bias/Fact Check.
1 source has no MBFC bias score and is not shown.
Source leans based on ratings by Media Bias/Fact Check.